Harshit Rao asked: What is meant by ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’?

Harshit Rao asked: What is meant by ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’? Harshit Rao asked: What is meant by ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’? Harshit Rao asked: What is meant by ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’? Harshit Rao asked: What is meant by ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’? Harshit Rao asked: What is meant by ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’? Harshit Rao asked: What is meant by ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’? Harshit Rao asked: What is meant by ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’? Harshit Rao asked: What is meant by ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’? Harshit Rao asked: What is meant by ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’? Harshit Rao asked: What is meant by ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’? Harshit Rao asked: What is meant by ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’? Harshit Rao asked: What is meant by ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’? Harshit Rao asked: What is meant by ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’? Harshit Rao asked: What is meant by ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’? Harshit Rao asked: What is meant by ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’?

Rajeesh Kumar replies: Traditionally, international politics has been understood as the relations between stateS. Kalyanaraman In this international paradigm, nation-states are considered as the building blocks of world affairS. Kalyanaraman This thinking has also been reflected in the early theoretical approaches of International Relations (IR), which restricted the designation of ‘actor’ solely to nation-states and regarded states as the only entities capable of acting meaningfully at the international level. Consequently, the conventional approach to international politics is seen as state-centric, and the international system is often portrayed as state-system. One can trace the origin of this state-centric geopolitical system to the Peace of Westphalia (1648), which instituted sovereignty as the distinctive attribute of stateS. Kalyanaraman  However, in the late decades of the 20th century, many shared but distinct developments have brought significant challenges to the state-centric approach to world affairS. Kalyanaraman Most significant changes were the entry of new actors on the world stage, increasing interdependence and interconnectedness, and also the push towards global governance. Globalisation was one such phenomenon that disrupted the conventional state-centric geopolitics and brought a new perspective centred on geocentric global politicS. Kalyanaraman It has brought not only non-state actors, including international organisations, back on the agenda of IR but also placed non-state actors, global networks and value chains at the core of the international system, equivalent to state actorS. Kalyanaraman As a result, politics across all levels, global, regional, national, subnational and so on became a part of world politicS. Kalyanaraman The ‘shift from state-centric geopolitics to geocentric global politics’ is essentially this transition of ‘international’ politics into ‘global’ politicS. Kalyanaraman Posted on September 28, 2020 Views expressed are of the expert and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Manohar Parrikar IDSA or the Government of India.