Vishal Chandra

Joined MP-IDSA
October 2003
Expertise
Politics of Afghan Conflict
Education
M.Phil., School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi; studied social-cultural Anthropology and History for undergraduate and postgraduate degree courses.
Background
He qualified the National Eligibility Test (NET) for Lectureship conducted by the University Grants Commission (UGC) of India in the year 2000, and was a recipient of the UGC fellowship on Area Studies Programme at the Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
He was associated with the Reintegration, Reconstruction & Reconciliation (R3) Working Group on Afghanistan, an initiative of the RNSSC/NESA Center for Strategic Studies, Washington D.C. He has also been associated with the India-Pakistan Track-II dialogue organised by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES, India).
He regularly lectures on Afghan affairs at various institutions. As part of his research, he has travelled widely in Afghanistan.
He is also Member of the MP-IDSA Web Editorial Team.
Select Publications
Book
The Unfinished War in Afghanistan: 2001-2014, MP-IDSA, Pentagon Press, New Delhi, 2014Reviews: Journal of Slavic Military Studies (Routledge, July-September 2015 issue), India Today/Mail Today (March 08, 2015), The Pioneer (Sunday Edition, March 08, 2015), The Book Review (February 2015), The New Straits Times (Kuala Lumpur, January 2015), Indian Foreign Affairs Journal (October-December 2014), Amar Ujala (Hindi, Sunday Edition, March 22, 2015) and Nai Dunia (Hindi, January 2015)
Edited Books
“India and South Asia: Exploring Regional Perceptions,” MP-IDSA, Pentagon Press, New Delhi, 2015
“India’s Neighbourhood: The Armies of South Asia”, MP-IDSA, Pentagon Press, New Delhi, 2013
“India’s Neighbourhood: Challenges Ahead”, MP-IDSA, Rubicon Publishers, Delhi, 2008 (co-edited)
Book Chapters
“Beijing: Kabul’s ‘Reliable’ Strategic Partner”, in Jagannath Prasad Panda (ed.), MP-IDSA China Year Book: China’s Transition Under Xi Jinping, Pentagon Press, New Delhi, 2016.
“Where is Afghanistan Headed?”, in Arpita Basu Roy and Srimanti Sarkar (eds.), The Political Future of Afghanistan: Issues and Perspectives , Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies (MAKAIAS), KW Publishers, New Delhi, 2016.
“Afghanistan 2014: Towards Uncertainty” in Maneesha Tikekar (ed.), Constitutionalism and Democracy in South Asia, New Delhi, Oxford University Press, 2014.
“Afghanistan Beyond 2014: The China Factor”, in S.D. Muni & Vivek Chadha (eds.), Asian Strategic Review, MP-IDSA, New Delhi, Pentagon Press, 2013. (co-authored)
“Afghanistan’s National Army: Expectations and Scepticism”, in India’s Neighbourhood: The Armies of South Asia, MP-IDSA, New Delhi, Pentagon Press, 2013.
“Afghanistan: Likely Scenarios & India’s Policy Options” in Rumel Dahiya & Ashok K. Behuria (eds.), India’s Neighbourhood: Challenges in the Next Two Decades, MP-IDSA, New Delhi, Pentagon Security International, 2012.
“Negotiating with the Afghan Taliban: Paving the Way to Peace or Civil War?”, in Arpita Basu Roy, Binoda Kumar Mishra & Aliva Mishra (eds.), International Intervention in Afghanistan: Motives & Approaches, New Delhi, Shipra Publications, 2012.
“Growing Afghan Maze: An Opportunity for Indo-Iranian Re-Engagement?”, in Anwar Alam (ed.), India and Iran: An Assessment of Contemporary Relations, New Delhi, New Century Publications, July 2011.
“Indo-Afghan Relations: Trends & Challenges” in India’s Foreign Policy: Continuity & Change, Delhi, Academic Excellence, 2008.
“Afghanistan: Divided Defenders of Democracy” in S.D. Muni (ed.), IDSA Asian Strategic Review 2008 and “Afghanistan: Growing Uncertainties” in S.D. Muni(ed.), MP-IDSA Asian Strategic Review 2007, New Delhi, Academic Foundation.
“The Taliban Resurrection & the Changing Course of Afghan Civil War” in K. Warikoo (ed.), Afghanistan: The Challenge, New Delhi, Pentagon Press, 2007.
Articles
“India Should Stay the Course”, Debate, Afghanistan Post-2014: India’s Options, Indian Foreign Affairs Journal, 8 (3), July-September, 2013.
“The Evolving Politics of Taliban Reintegration and Reconciliation in Afghanistan”, Strategic Analysis, 35 (5), September 2011.
“Russia’s Growing Afghan Re-Engagement”, Strategic Analysis, 35 (4), July 2011.
“India in the Afghan Maze: Search for Options”, Debate, Strategic Analysis,35(1), January 2011.
“The National Front in Afghan Politics: An Exploratory Study”, Strategic Analysis, 33 (4), July 2009.
“Making of the New Afghan National Army: Challenges & Prospects”, Strategic Analysis, 33 (1), January 2009.
“Will NATO Stay On in Afghanistan?”, Strategic Analysis, 33 (5), September 2009.
“Taliban Resurrection: Challenges and Options before India”, World Focus, 27 (9), September 2006.
“Warlords, Drugs and the ‘War on Terror’ in Afghanistan: The Paradoxes”, Strategic Analysis, Special Issue, 30(1), January-March 2006.
“The Afghan Elections and the Bonn Process: Assessing India’s Options”, Strategic Analysis, 29 (4), October-December 2005.
“Politicsin Post-Taliban Afghanistan: An Assessment”, Strategic Analysis, 29 (2), April-June 2005.
Short Articles/Commentaries
“Need to Take a More Confident View of Kabul”, April 28, 2015
“Tackling Terror: Kabul Has Tough, Long Road Ahead”, Sunday Spotlight, Deccan Herald, December 28, 2014, p. 7.
“Total Recount in Afghanistan: What Next?”, MP-IDSA Issue Brief, July 26, 2014
“Will Transition of Power in Afghanistan be Smooth?”, Saturday Special Op-Ed, The Pioneer, May 10, 2014, p. 9.
‘For Now, it is Ballot over Bullet in Afghanistan’, April 18, 2014.
‘Training programmes will continue even in worst case scenario’, The Sunday Indian, March 3, 2013 issue.
“Working with an emerging ‘New Afghanistan’”, Deccan Herald, November 25, 2012
“Post-2014 Afghanistan and India’s Options”, MP-IDSA Policy Brief, July 18, 2012 (co-authored).
“Fantasising ‘Afghan Good Enough’”, June 22, 2012.
“Will Karzai Survive 2014?”, May 22, 2012.
“The Battle for Kabul has Begun”, April 18, 2012.
“The Bonn II Conference on Afghanistan: A Step Forward Amidst Uncertainty”, December 19, 2011.
“The July 7 Attack in Kabul and India’s Search for a Response”, July 18, 2008.
“Karzai Raises the Anti-Taliban Rhetoric”, June 30, 2008.
“Afghanistan: Galloping Backward”, December 27, 2006.
“Import of Afghan President’s Visit to India”, April 26, 2006.

  • Research Fellow
  • Email:chandra[dot]vishal[at]gmail[dot]com
  • Phone: +91 11 2671 7983

Publication

//

India’s Neighbourhood: The Armies of South Asia

  • Publisher: Pentagon Press
    2013

This book is an attempt to examine the role, relevance and status of the armies in the ever dynamic socio-political milieu of the countries in India’s South Asian neighbourhood. The book deals with the national armies of seven South Asian countries bordering India, namely Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Maldives, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The contributors to the volume also trace out the likely trajectory of the future role and position of the armies in the given or evolving national and geo-political settings.

  • ISBN 978-81-8274-706-0,
  • Price: ₹. 795/-
  • E-copy available

  • Published: 2013
//

The Unfinished War in Afghanistan: 2001-2014

  • Publisher: Pentagon Press
    2014

This book makes a modest attempt to contribute to the ongoing debate on future challenges for Afghanistan as the largest ever coalition of Western forces prepares to withdraw. It seeks to examine key political developments within Afghanistan over the last one decade in response to the US-led Western military and political intervention.

  • ISBN 978-81-8274-762-3,
  • Price: ₹. 1495/-
  • E-copy available

  • Published: 2014
//

India and South Asia: Exploring Regional Perceptions

  • Publisher: Pentagon Press
    2015

Perceptions play a very significant role in South Asian politics. They have largely shaped and influenced state policies and politics among the South Asian countries, especially in relation to India, over the years. State policies have at times been hostage to negative or adversarial perceptions, well-entrenched in the popular psyche. The perception formation in South Asia is an extremely dynamic process and has evolved differently in different countries. Perceptions are not static and often change with the shift in domestic as well as regional and global politics.

  • ISBN 978-81-8274-812-5,
  • Price: ₹. 995/-
  • E-copy available

  • Published: 2015
//

Pakistan opposes ‘pre-conditions’ for Kabul-Taliban talks

The Quadrilateral Coordination Committee or Group comprising Afghanistan, Pakistan, China and the United States held its first round of meeting in Islamabad on 11th January. The four-nation committee has been formed to help revive and coordinate talks between representatives of the Afghan Government and the Pakistan-based Taliban leadership. Pakistani delegation was led by its Foreign Secretary Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry. The United States was represented by its Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard G. Olson and the Chinese Government by its Special Envoy for Afghanistan Deng Xijun.

The process of reviving the Quadrilateral picked up after Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and Afghan President Ashraf Ghani briefly met on the sidelines of the Paris Climate Change Conference on 30th November. President Ghani’s visit to Islamabad last month to inaugurate the Fifth Heart of Asia Ministerial Conference, jointly with Nawaz Sharif, proved to be a major ice breaker. Both the leaders also participated in the China-Pakistan-Afghanistan and Pakistan-Afghanistan-US trilateral meetings and finally a quadrilateral meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and the US Deputy Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken. Pakistan Army chief General Raheel Sharif later visited Kabul on December 27 and met President Ghani to take the process forward.

The agenda for the first meeting of the Quadrilateral Coordination Group was clearly set by the host Pakistan Government. Sartaj Aziz, Foreign Affairs Advsior to Nawaz Sharif, spelt out the agenda of the meeting but also suggested the way forward. According to Mr. Aziz, the first and foremost task before the Quadrilateral is to define the overall direction of the reconciliation process along with the goals and targets it would like to set with a view to creating a conducive environment for holding direct talks between Afghan government and Taliban groups. He was of the view that specific tasks should be assigned to the member countries of the Quadrilateral based on the “principle of shared responsibility”. He expressed the hope that the meeting will help to evolve an efficient procedural framework for the functioning of the Quadrilateral.

Mr. Aziz argued that pre-conditions should not be attached to the reconciliation process as it will prove counterproductive. Instead, it needs to create conditions to bring the Taliban groups to the negotiation table and offer them incentives that can persuade them to move away from using violence as tool for pursuing political goals. Mr. Aziz pointed out that threat of the use of military action against irreconcilables cannot precede the offer of talks to all the groups and their response to such offers. He added that dealing with the irreconcilables can follow once the avenues for bringing them to the talks have been exhausted. He cautioned the Quadrilateral against setting unrealistic targets and deadlines.

Though the next round of meeting is expected to take place in Kabul in the near future, nothing has been stated regarding the Taliban participation. A spokesman for the Afghan Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah had stated in the run up to the Quadrilateral meeting that Pakistan would be providing a list of Taliban willing to talk with the government, but the joint statement issued at the end of the meeting did not mention anything regarding it. Taliban meanwhile continue to refuse to enter into any dialogue with the National Unity Government.

Though Taliban chief Mullah Akhtar Mansoor was reportedly injured when fighting broke out among the Taliban commanders near Quetta in early December, he appears to have succeeded in reaching out to the breakaway faction led by Mullah Muhammad Rasool. Both groups have reportedly agreed for a ceasefire. Meanwhile, the security situation continues to deteriorate across much of Afghanistan particularly in southern Helmand Province where most of the districts have either fallen or are on the verge of falling to the Taliban.

It remains to be seen if the Quadrilateral initiative would succeed in finally restraining the Afghan Taliban from launching their annual summer offensive this year. Pakistan’s emphasis on conducting talks without pre-conditions could make the reconciliation process unsustainable for Kabul. Until then, talks for the sake of talks can go on.

This article was originally published in AIR World Service.

  • Published: 13 January, 2016
//

Where is Afghanistan Headed

Associate Fellow, IDSA, Mr Vishal Chandra’s chapter ‘Where is Afghanistan Headed?’ was published in the edited volume The Political Future of Afghanistan: Issues and Perspectives by Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies (MAKAIAS), Kolkata, India.

Abstract of Chapter

The notably inclusive post-Taliban political system may not all together wither away, but retaining its fundamental character will certainly be far more difficult in years to come. The worrying aspect is lack of sustainable consensus on an alternative but inclusive political framework that could help restore internal socio-political balance of power. This basically means Afghanistan would remain in an extended state of transition.

More details [+]

  • Published: 26 November, 2015
//

Total Recount in Afghanistan: What Next?

As all the votes cast in the run-off election are audited and recounted under international supervision, the final outcome could be a close finish with winning candidate leading by a much narrow margin. The process of constitutional amendment can only be initiated after the new parliament is formed as parliamentary elections are due in 2015.